For or against Brexit?

brexit european union withdrawal united kingdom uk eu
Numéro 1

Learn the ropes

What is Brexit and how did it happen?
Brexit is the term used to describe the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union.
This withdrawal was put to vote in UK via a referendum on June 23, 2016. 52% of voters chose to exit the EU. This exit is the first in history for the EU, and it was made possible by the article 50 of the Treaty on European Union, which offer the possibility for a Member State to withdraw from the organization.

The Brexit referendum opened a long period of exit negotiations between the United Kingdom and the European Union. UK notified the EU authorities about its will of withdrawal on March 29, 2017. The country had then two years to negotiate the exit.

The withdrawal agreement negotiated between UK and EU was rejected several times by the British House of Commons, and in consequence the withdrawal was postponed two times. Both sides agreed on a second exit deal in October 2019, and the United Kingdom left EU on January 31, 2020.

Source: Toute l’Europe

What are the main points of the withdrawal agreement?
The withdrawal agreement was concluded thanks to a compromise on several points which are very sensitive for both the United Kingdom and the European Union. First, according to the Johnson/EU deal, Northern Ireland will remain in the EU trade zone and will have to apply more restrictive norms to the products which might then be introduced on the European market. Also, both EU citizens living in the UK and British citizens living in the EU will conserve their rights after the withdrawal. The Court of Justice of the EU will remain competent to settle disputes in the UK until the end of the transition period.

Unless the end of the transition period is postponed, it should come to an end on December 31, 2020.

Source: Toute l’Europe

Why are we talking about it today?
Negotiations on future relationship between the EU and the UK officially started on 25 February 2020. They will be continued by Michel Barnier on behalf of the European Union, and by David Frost for the United Kingdom. Trade and fisheries remain the most sensitive topics so far.
Numéro 2

Choose your side

The idea behind the Rift is simple: for each topic of debate, we provide you with an expertise based on a pro-con approach, written by competent and legitimate experts. We want to help you make your own opinion, and guide you on first steps to civic engagement.
What is your opinion before reading the article?


FOR

Brexit: a great opportunity for the UK, a missed opportunity for the left

thomas fazi brexit uk eu withdrawal debate

Thomas Fazi

Writer and journalist

thomasfazi.net

According to most policymakers and commentators, Brexit was a tragically ill-fated decision that will spell disaster for the UK. In this brief article, I’d like to propose a radically opposite view – of the vote itself and of its potential consequences.

Let’s begin with the former. I’m of the opinion that the Leave victory was not, as Remainers (or, now, Rejoiners) contend, a triumph of ignorance, racism, nationalism, right-wing propaganda etc. (which is not to say those elements didn’t play a role), but was rather, on a deeper level, a moment of great democratic insurgency.

For the first time in many years, the British people were given a chance to – quite literally – change the course of history through the ballot box. And they proceeded to do just that, by yielding an outcome that most people (including the Tories that sponsored the referendum) considered impossible, especially given the incessant anti-Brexit fear-mongering by the media and political establishment. After decades of hollowing out of the democratic process (in the UK and throughout the West), this re-entry of the masses into history – and their wholly legitimate demand for ‘taking back control’ of the political and economic process – should be seen as an exciting new development.

The real historical importance of the Brexit vote, however, lies in the fact that it broke the TINA (there is no alternative) spell that has been the main driving force behind the neoliberal consensus, depoliticisation of democracy and death of radical politics in recent decades. By demonstrating that there is always an alternative, Brexit dramatically widens the Overton window, opening up a whole new range of political possibilities. Especially considering that the surrendering of national prerogatives to supranational institutions and super-state bureaucracies (most notably the EU itself) has been a central aspect of depoliticisation: i.e. the insulation of macroeconomic policy from popular contestation.

In this sense, leaving the EU – an anti-democratic neoliberal juggernaut based primarily around the protection of capital rights – should be seen as a positive achievement in and of itself. Moving forward, there is no reason to believe Brexit should spell disaster for the UK. On the contrary, it creates the policy space to implement truly transformative politics that would be impossible under EU law. Will the Tories seize this opportunity? Probably not. But a Corbyn-led Labour could have, which is why its refusal to embrace Brexit – which ultimately sealed its fate – is such a tragedy. 

AGAINST

Nothing good for Ireland comes from Brexit

martina anderson brexit mep north ireland sinn féin

Martina Anderson

Former MEP for North Ireland, Sinn Féin

martinamep.eu

The North of Ireland has a unique constitutional status. 

The GFA (Good Friday Agreement) provides for any constitutional change to be voted upon. 

It also put in place a range of provisions which would ensure closer north-south cooperation, it establishes north-south bodies, and identifies a number of “agreed areas of cooperation” with a view to these areas of cooperation being extended as the need arose. 

In order to recognise and manage the constitutional dispensation of the agreement, political institutions were put in place to deal with governance within the North, on a north-south basis and on an east-west basis.

The effect of the unilateral decision of the British government to remove the North of Ireland from the EU amounts to a major constitutional upheaval – effectively a constitutional change without the agreement of the majority. 

The EU Customs Union and the Single Market allows for the development of an all-island economy and the removal of border infrastructure. 

North-South cooperation across a range of areas is embedded in EU rules. 

EU membership ensures that a range of rights are available to citizens in the north on an equal basis, regardless of whether they were British or Irish or both. 

Undermining these undermines the GFA itself.

The only possible way to respect the British vote to leave the EU and uphold the GFA was to put in place special arrangements for the North of Ireland – a sort of special status. This evolved into the so-called “backstop”, which is now being rejected by the British government – effectively a rejection of the Good Friday Agreement as a whole.

Even with the “backstop”, Brexit still damages Ireland, and in particular the North. 

EU funding across a range of areas will disappear; access to the single market will only be partial; EU rights are not fully protected for Irish/EU citizens in the North.

Undoubtedly it is better for the North of Ireland to remain in the EU, as voted for by the majority in the Brexit referendum. This can, and should, be decided on the island of Ireland, as provided for in the Good Friday Agreement by the calling of a referendum on Irish unification.

This article was written when Ms. Anderson was still in office, before the UK withdrew from the EU on 31 January 2020.

What is your opinion now?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Empowering opinions